Study of Maintenance Contribution to Joint Production and Preventive maintenance Scheduling in the Robustness Framework

dc.citation.epage164
dc.citation.issue1-2-3
dc.citation.spage144
dc.citation.volume10
dc.contributor.authorBenbouzid-Sitayeb, Fatima
dc.contributor.authorBendjoudi, Ahcène
dc.contributor.authorBenkhallat, Samir
dc.contributor.authorVarnier, Cristophe
dc.contributor.authorZerhouni, Nouredine
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-12T10:14:18Z
dc.date.available2013-06-12T10:14:18Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we deal with a joint production and Preventive Maintenance (PM) scheduling problem in the robustness framework. The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, we will establish that the insertion of maintenance activities during production scheduling can hedge against some changes in the shop environment. Furthermore, we will check if respecting the optimal intervals of maintenance activities guarantees a minimal robustness threshold. Then, we will try to identify from the used optimisation criteria those that allow making predictive schedules more robust. The computational experiments in a flowshop show that joint production and PM schedules are more robust than production schedules and maintenance provides an acceptable tradeoff between equipment reliability and performance loss under disruption.fr_FR
dc.identifier.issn1477-9056
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.cerist.dz/handle/CERIST/191
dc.publisherIndersciencefr_FR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Product Development
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Product Development;10, 1/2/3
dc.relation.pages144-164fr_FR
dc.rights.holderIndersciencefr_FR
dc.structureRéseaux Large Bande et Réseaux Sans Filfr_FR
dc.subjectproduction; preventive maintenance; joint scheduling; disruption; robustness; optimisation criteria; flowshopfr_FR
dc.titleStudy of Maintenance Contribution to Joint Production and Preventive maintenance Scheduling in the Robustness Frameworkfr_FR
dc.typeArticle
Files